ABSTRACT
Serum 1,3-ß-d-glucan(BDG) is a broad fungal biomarker for invasive fungal disease (IFD). More data is still required to support the Fujifilm Wako assay as a valuable alternative to the widely used Fungitell assay. We included archived serum samples from 157 individuals (97 cases; 33-IA, 64-IC, and 60 controls) for the comparative performance evaluation of the Fungitell assay and the Fujifilm Wako assay for IFD diagnosis. The BDG value was significantly higher in patients with IFD vs. controls (70.79 pg/mL vs. 3.03 pg/mL, p: 0.0002). An area under the curve (AUC) for the IFD, IC, and IA diagnosis was 0.895, 0.910, and 0.866, respectively, for the Fujifilm Wako assay. Based on the highest Youden's index (0.667), a cutoff of 5 pg/mL was selected as the optimum for the Fujifilm Wako assay with good sensitivity (79.4%), specificity (88.3%) and agreement (84.7%, Cohen's k:0.691) with the Fungitell assay. The mean run-time of the Fujifilm Wako assay was 70.12 min, and real-time observation allowed earlier time to result in Fujifilm Wako vs. Fungitell assay (37 vs. 120 min, p: < 0.0001). Thus, our findings support the diagnostic value of the Fujifilm Wako assay for the diagnosis of IFD. However, there is still a need to validate diagnostic protocols to optimize their use in multi-centre studies with different patient groups.